- Measure B
- Backdoor Raises
- Little Dog
- BOS Matters
- Motorcycle Fatality
- Ed Desk
- Yesterday's Catch
- Go Exempt
- Peaceful Secessionism
- Burns Critics
- Read Differently
- Dead Bust
- BART Circus
- Redwood Genes
- Tunnels Lawsuit
- Future Plans
ANDERSON VALLEY BREWING held its 6th annual Mowkeef, which means "Fall Harvest Celebration" in Boontling. Many folks enjoyed a day of Music and BBQ. Serving up the Suds were Ginny Hallam and Ronnie Righter. (Photo by Bonnie Clarke Johnson.)
SONYA NESCH WRITES: This is a link to the hour-long talk Sheriff Allman gave about Measure B last Thursday night in Fort Bragg. There is also an editorial by Marianne McGee supporting Measure B.
The Case For Measure B
SEVERAL COUNTY DEPARTMENT HEADS are in line for big raises via the backdoor, aka the consent agenda. Supervisors Agenda Item 4s):
“Adoption of Resolution Authorizing Adoption of Salary Grade Adjustments as follows:
Agriculture Commissioner/Sealer Weights and Measures, Salary Grade D45B to D47D; Chief Probation Officer, Salary Grade D46A to Salary Grade D48D; Director Human Resources, Salary Grade U46A to Salary Grade D48D; and Director Planning and Building, Salary Grade D46B to Salary Grade D48D Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution authorizing the adoption of salary grade adjustments.”
TRANSLATION: Five sons and daughters are getting very large pay increases on top of already high salaries without so much as a hint why they deserve them. Transparent California says “Interim” Ag Commissioner Diane Curry’s 2016 base salary was about $72k per year. But that translates to less than $2800 per biweekly pay period, which is below the range shown in the attached resolution-chart for her existing pay range. Nevertheless, the Ag Commissioner’s salary bracket will increase from $86k-$105k to $100k-$121k, an increase of between $14k and $16k per year. Then add 75% of that to get total pay and benefits which, like all of Mendo’s lavishly compensated department heads, includes generous health insurance, pension, up to five weeks of paid vacation, ten paid holidays, bottomless sick leave, bereavement leave, management leave, disability and catastrophic leave, and personal time off.
ON TOP of these bennies, there are numerous non-salary perks like life insurance, training compensation, computer/cellphone, memberships, professional books, computer training and materials, physical exams, health club memberships, and credit cards.
THE CHIEF PROBATION OFFICER, whoever that person is today given that Chief Probation Officer Pamela Markham has been out on indefinite paid administrative leave, the salary goes from $91k-$111k to $105k-$128k, an increase of between $14k and $17k.
HUMAN RESOURCES BOSS Heidi Dunham’s salary goes from $92k-$112k to $105k-$128k, an increase of between $13k and $16k.
ACTING Planning and Building Director Ignacio ‘Nash’ Gonzalez’s salary bracket will increase from $92k-$112k to $105k-$128k, an increase of between $13k and $16k.
ADDING to the confusion (probably intentional), the current pay bracket ranges on the County’s website for these four positions don’t match what the Resolution says.
ALL TOTALED, these four department heads are pulling down around $200k a year each in total pay, benefits and perks.
LOOKED at another way, when one of these department heads sits in the Board chambers and talks for a few minutes it costs the taxpayers about $100 an hour.
AND THEY DON'T even have to provide monthly reporting to the CEO or the Board of Supervisors.
PS. We found it surprising that, according to Transparent California for 2016, Assistant CEO Alan ‘The Kid’ Flora made more in total pay and benefits than the District Attorney.
LITTLE DOG SAYS, “Sure the feng shui is off here — way off — but we do have a nice garden, a ‘restorative garden,’ The Boss claims, a jumble of flowers and, as he puts it, ‘the more attractive weeds.’ And you know what? If you look straight at it, if you block out the rest of the place, you really can get a little bit of a lift.”
ONLY A FEW DECADES LATE, the Board of Supervisors is planning to “Consider a Unified Approach Regarding Contracting for Dispatch Services for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and Fire Services.”
THE DISCUSSION is on the Tuesday Board of Supervisors agenda as a follow-up item to their September 19 decision to hold off on putting Calfire’s dispatch services out to bid. During that discussion it seemed to suddenly dawn on Ukiah and the Board of Supervisors that there are too many semi-redundant dispatch operations in Mendocino County, a point that should have been raised long ago.
BUT MENDO'S expensively outsourced advisers, the Sonoma County based LEMSA (Local emergency medical services agency) named Coastal Valley EMS, the supposed “staff” that Mendo has turned such things over to, failed to bring up the redundancy despite thousands of dollars, several reports, studies, and of course, consultants.
SHERIFF ALLMAN had previously noted that Mendo doesn’t need three or four overlapping night-shift dispatch operations. Mendo really only needs two dispatch operations: Fire/Medical and police. The Board will discuss Supervisor Dan Gjerde’s proposed “unified approach” to dispatch in an ad hoc committee, clearly avoiding the Sonoma County LEMSA which seems to be leading Mendo astray time and again. Mendo already has a small emergency services office and it’s past time to stop wasting money on the Sonoma County agency and bring the entire issue back home to Mendo.
* * *
THE BOARD ALSO plans to issue its typical non-responses to grand jury criticism, particularly the Grand Jury’s recent “Another Look At Family And Children’s Services” (FCS, formerly CPS). At least this year it looks like the Board actually read the reports and prepared some responses themselves, rather than turning the Grand Jury report over to the County Counsel’s office for blanket denials as per previous custom.
BUT THE SUPE'S responses, while at least acknowledging that there’s a serious staffing problem in FCS, are more empty rhetoric because the Board and the CEO continue to refuse to require monthly status reports from their most troubled department. (How many children in foster care, how many taken from parents and why, how many vacant slots, etc.)
THE GRAND JURY noted that “Mendocino County has a higher rate than the State average for removal of children from their families due to a lack of early intervention in troubled families, the drug culture, high unemployment, lack of housing, and the lack of teenage drug treatment programs.”
THE SUPES FATUOUS RESPONSE: “Partially disagree. Mendocino County does have a higher rate than the State average for removal of children from their families. However, the reasons stated by the Grand Jury are only contributing factors in this problem and not solely responsible for the emergency removal due to abuse or neglect. That said, the BOS understands these factors can be detrimental to families and is working with HHSA and partners to address them. The BOS incorporates the response by HHSA.”
IF WE had any idea what the Board meant by “working with HHSA and partners” we might have some remote hope that the grim situation of displaced children would improve. But without specifics as to what “working with” means, it sounds like the County plans to do nothing at all.
THE GRAND JURY also observed, “The new State eligibility requirements and training requirements for foster homes may reduce the rate of abuse and changes in foster care placements, but make it even harder for Mendocino County agencies to recruit foster families.”
SUPES PIE IN THE SKY RESPONSE: “Partially disagree. This is speculation and the hope is that the rates of abuse will decline and foster families will be able and willing to comply with the new requirements. This will need to be evaluated after sufficient time has passed for an effect to be seen.”
UNLESS THE SUBJECT is put on an monthly reporting schedule so that the “evaluation” can be followed up on, the County will do absolutely nothing and the “hoped for” situation won’t change. As with everything else, the Board’s failure to require even the most minimal monthly reporting from its biggest department, Health and Human Services, means that nothing ever gets “evaluated” and nothing ever changes.
THE GRAND JURY also reminded the Board that nothing has changed since the last time the GJ looked at FCS: “The Grand Jury notes management is seeking outside help to analyze and correct the Departmental issues. However, the problems noted in the 2014-15 Report still need corrective action.”
SUPES RESPONSE: “Partially disagree. HHSA management has been working diligently to improve morale, increase training opportunities, improve response times and have an atmosphere of collaboration. HR has worked hard to fill vacancies since the 2014-15 report. The BOS has approved a pay increase of 3% for the next two years to include longevity pay and differential pay for certain areas.”
“WORKING DILIGENTLY.” … “Worked hard.” Right. Without that reporting the Board has no basis at all to say how hard anyone is working or whether that “work” is producing any results. The only thing true in that response is the last sentence, a simple reflection of the across the board pay raise the Board authorized a few months ago — which had nothing to do with the problem the Grand Jury was talking about.
MOTORCYCLIST PASSES ON LEFT, PASSES ON LIFE
ACCOUNTS by ava readers Bedrock and Choteau of their youths in New York City, reminded me of the time I lived in a SRO at 5th and Brannan, south of Market in San Francisco. I think I paid fifty a month for a room overlooking the intersection. For my fifty bucks I got a high-ceilinged room, a shared bathroom with a grimy tub down the hall, clean sheets every Friday.(I cadged showers from friends. The history of that tub was too much to contemplate.) South of Market then was a forest of single room hotels peopled by old guys mostly, along with serious drunks, and people not quite crazy enough for the state hospital at Napa. One night, squeezing past an old guy who lived in the room next door, he suddenly attacked me, peppering me with skillfully thrown punches that would have hurt if he still had some force behind them. I pinned him against the wall and told him I was going to get him 86'd. The next day he was his usual jolly self. I asked him why he'd hit me. "I did no such thing," he said. "What's wrong with you?"
FAST FORWARD sixty years and these people are the homeless. 5th and Brannan was a three-story building that tilted rather severely to one side. Out on the street, residents leaned in greeting, our very own Masonic handshake. On the ground floor was shop space occupied by a Gypsy family. "Need a transmission, boss?" They were always trying to sell me stuff I assumed was stolen, not that stolen stuff was high on my list of scruples. I was by far the youngest person in my all-male building except for the Gypsy women below. I would see them around the city at night selling corsages to young couples. "You want your lady to be more beautiful?" I brought a girlfriend up to see my room one afternoon, a Friday. I was hailed by the manager, a shell-shocked veteran, that it was sheet day. My girlfriend started to cry. "This is the most depressing place I've ever been in my life," she said. "I won't go one more step." The shell-shocked vet advised me later, "I think your friend is nuts, kid. You better trade her in." A few weeks later, climbing the stairs to the cheap seats at the Geary Theater — live theater was affordable then — she started screaming, "Vertigo! Please help me!" I wanted to toss her over the balcony as she started to laugh. "Hah! Gotcha going, didn't I?" She was a laugh a minute, but I couldn't stand the excitement and, as the song went, slip-slided away soon afterwards. I walk through the area now and it's unrecognizable, with sleek structures, sleek people, the oddity being that in some blocks, the sleek people are less numerous than the kind of people who used to live at 5th and Brannan. They now live on the street.
CATCH OF THE DAY, October 1, 2017
FERNANDO, AGUILAR, Ukiah. DUI, controlled substance, paraphernalia.
MANUEL AYALA-RODRIGUEZ, Ukiah. DUI-alcohol&drugs, county parole violation.
ANTELMO BARRALES, Ukiah. DUI.
RONALD BLOYD, Navarro. Failure to appear.
ZACHARY BROWN, Redwood Valley. Domestic abuse, damaging a communications device, suspended license, probation revocation.
PATRICK LEHRE, Healdsburg/Ukiah. Protective order violation.
ANTHONY MCCARTHY, Ukiah. DUI, battery on peace officer, resisting.
FABIER MELENDEZ-CRUZ, Ukiah. DUI, no license.
CHRISTINA MUNOZ, Laytonville. DUI-alcohol&drugs, controlled substance, paraphernalia, failure to appear.
RICKEY PHILLIPS III, Willits. Probation revocation.
DAVID SANDIEGO JR., Ukiah. Domestic battery.
KAYLEE SIMILI, Ukiah. DUI, suspended license.
LESLI WALL, Willits. DUI, willful cruelty to child with possible injury/death.
My suggestion to all taxpayers who feel they are paying too much and are sick of tax cuts for the rich is to go exempt. File a new W-4 and either claim 10 exemptions or mark exempt. Save your tax payments in your savings account so that in April you can pay your taxes as required. This will withhold current taxes from, and hopefully get the attention of, a government that wants to tax the poor to death to give tax breaks to the rich.
ON LINE COMMENT OF THE DAY
Putting any hope in politicians and a political party is simply foolish. Particularly when you’re talking about a central government leviathan that exists to exist. No, the answer is peaceful secessionism. It’s time for regions, states, cities to go their own way. Localism shouldn’t be relegated to produce and beer & wine. Starve D.C., the attorneys/lobbyists/elected officials, the ladder climbing bureaucrats, the war seeking generals and their defense company puppet masters.
It can happen, and is happening elsewhere at this very moment.
BURNS/NOVICK, VIETNAM, AND THE LEFT
Leftist John Pilger refers to the the kind of thing in the first episode that fed that skepticism:
The narrator says the war "was begun in good faith by decent people out of fateful misunderstandings, American overconfidence and Cold War misunderstandings"...There was no good faith. The faith was rotten and cancerous. For me---as it must be for many Americans---it is difficult to watch the film's jumble of "red peril" maps, unexplained interviewees, ineptly cut archive and maudlin American battlefield sequences.
But Pilger admits, before launching a typical leftist screed about US foreign policy, he only saw the first episode and some previews and press releases about the series.
Pete Dolack on Counterpunch:
The Ken Burns/Lynn Novick television series on the Vietnam War provides yet another example of the narrowness of “acceptable” political discourse in the United States. More than four decades past the end of that imperialist adventure, having a serious discussion about it remains taboo. The series also provides a fresh example of how the narrowness of acceptable discourse is disguised through the appearance of a vigorous debate.
Okay, but Dolack goes Pilger one better when he follows with this:
I will confess here I have not watched Burns and Novick’s The Vietnam War, but the consistency of the many discussions of it I have read confirm what would have been expected: The liberal side of the “debate” on the Vietnam War, that an “honorable” effort was tragically miscarried because of “mistakes.”
Like Pilger, Dolack already knows without seeing it what to think about the series! His leftist ideology fills in all the blanks. Incredibly, the title of his piece is "Can't We Have an Honest Conversation About Vietnam?" We can't have a discussion, honest or otherwise, about the Burns/Novick series with someone who hasn't even seen it.
The anonymous blogger at Systemic Disorder has the same rote ideological reaction without actually watching the series.
The problem they have — or would have if they actually bothered to watch the series — is that it's very good. No one who supported that war can, after viewing this series, have any doubt about what a disaster it was from the beginning for the US and even more so for Vietnam.
The battles examined are agonizing to watch, as American troops stumble into one botched operation after another, even as they inflict massive casualties on their Vietnamese antagonists with artillery and air power.
I do object to the subtitle on one of the pictures: "There is no single truth in war."
You can examine this war from different perspectives, but the most significant truth about the American role in this war: Vietnam was a colonial war that the United States rebranded as an anti-Communist war. It was never about freedom versus democracy or any other such high-minded piffle deployed to justify it.
(Rob Anderson, District5Diary)
CAT & MAT
In 2015, the novelist Catherine Nichols sent the opening pages of the book she was working on to 50 literary agents. She got so little response she decided to shift gender and try as “George” instead. The difference amazed her. “A third of the agents who saw his query wanted to see more, where my numbers never did shift from one in 25.” The words, as written by George, had an appeal that Catherine could only envy. She also, perhaps, felt a little robbed. “He is eight and a half times better than me at writing the same book.”
This was hardly a scientific study, but it is tempting to join her in concluding that men and women are read differently, even when they write the same thing. If a man writes, “The cat sat on the mat,” we admire the economy of his prose; if a woman does we find it banal. If a man writes, “The cat sat on the mat” we are taken by the simplicity of his sentence structure, its toughness and precision. We understand the connection between “cat” and “mat,” sense the grace of the animal, admire the way the percussive monosyllables sharpen the geometrics of the mat beneath. If the man is an Irish writer we ask if the cat is Pangúr Ban, the monk’s cat from the ninth-century poem of that name — the use of assonance surely points to the Gaelic tradition — in which case the mat is his monk’s cell, a representation of the life of the mind, its comforts and delineations. The cat, female and probably white, is the secret sensuality of the ascetic life; not in the monastery garden, or out in the bog, but sitting in its proper, bounded place. Or the mat is Ireland itself, if this is not too much of a stretch, in the age of saints and scholars, that golden, undivided time before the Norman invasion, in which case the cat could be anything at all: the playful cipher, sitting on a very inert, territorial mat. No — scratch all that — this is just a very truthful, very real sentence (look at those nouns!) containing both masculine “mat” and feminine “cat.” It somehow Says It All.
If, on the other hand, a woman writes, “The cat sat on the mat,” her concerns are clearly domestic, and sort of limiting. Time to go below the comments line and make jokes about pussy … I am kidding, of course. These are anxieties, projections, phantasmagoria – things to which women are particularly prone.
— Anne Enright
OCTOBER 3, 1967: Two members of the Grateful Dead — the lively San Francisco group responsible for such rock hits as “Good Morning, Little School Girl” — were busted on marijuana charges yesterday. The raid — on the Dead’s way-out 13-room pad at 710 Ashbury Street — also led to the arrest of the group’s equipment manager, two business managers and six girls, variously described as “friends,” “visitors” and “just girls.” Band members arrested in the raid were Ron (Pigpen) McKernan, 22, The Dead’s flamboyant, long-haired singer, and rhythm guitarist Robert Weir, 19. Matthew O’Connor, State narcotics bureau head, said that agents confiscated over a pound of marijuana and its big brother, hashish.
“They were processing some marijuana in the kitchen by running it through a colander to get rid of the stems and seeds. Five hippies who were released walked across the street and sat on the sidewalk watching the proceedings. When the first person came out of the building in handcuffs, one girl yelled a familiar 12-letter epithet at the police. The Dead came on the scene last year as the group playing for a Capital Records documentary called “LSD.” The record was produced by Owsley Stanley, a 31-year old who reportedly retired a millionaire by selling acid before it became illegal. The group then teamed up with novelist Ken Kesey for his “Acid Test” happenings. The name of the group comes from an Egyptian prayer; “We grateful dead praise you, Osiris…”
(SF Chronicle archive via Johnny Miller)
BART’S TRAVELING CIRCUS
On a recent BART ride from Berkeley to Colma, I was “entertained” by the breakdancers who turned their music up to full volume and then performed in the doorway, by two panhandlers walking the aisle, the skateboarder who seemed to think we’d reached the Embarcadero already and was showing his stuff, four people sleeping across two or more seats, a pizza box (and its contents) spilled on the floor and the two large dogs (and their masters, without any obvious service dog markings).
Having used public transportation all over the world, I can state that I never see such things outside our wonderful Bay Area. I don’t need more noise and dirt on the trains, and I certainly don’t need the chaos, however colorful it might be. I also can’t imagine what a visitor to the area might think about this scene. BART needs to pick up its game and give us a safe, clean and orderly transportation system. Let’s leave the circus for somewhere else please.
Bruce Klafter, San Mateo
With just a fraction of old-growth redwoods remaining, scientists hope to help them survive warming climate.
GROUPS SUE BROWN ADMINISTRATION OVER PERMIT TO KILL ENDANGERED SALMON, SMELT IN DELTA TUNNELS
by Dan Bacher
Four environmental groups on Friday, September 22, filed a lawsuit challenging the Brown administration’s permit to kill endangered salmon and smelt in the proposed Delta Tunnels project.
The Center for Biological Diversity, Bay Institute, Natural Resources Defense Council and San Francisco Baykeeper filed the suit in California Superior Court in Sacramento, represented by the nonprofit environmental law firm Earthjustice.
On July 28, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), under the helm of Director Chuck Bonham, issued an “incidental take permit” for the construction and operation of California WaterFix in “compliance” with Section 2081(b) of the California Endangered Species Act (CESA).
This suit is the first to challenge CDFW’s issuance of a “take” permit for the tunnel operations. Representatives of the groups said the agency “improperly authorized” the California Department Water Resources to “kill and harm” state-protected fish species, including Sacramento River winter-run and spring-run chinook salmon, longfin smelt and Delta smelt.
Ironically, the mission of the CDFW “is to manage California's diverse fish, wildlife, and plant resources, and the habitats upon which they depend, for their ecological values and for their use and enjoyment by the public.”
But according to tunnels opponents, the CDFW is failing in its mission to “manage” California’s diverse fish populations by approving the take permit.
“This is an unjustifiable permit,” said Jeff Miller, conservation advocate for the Center for Biological Diversity (CBD), in a phone interview. “The main thing is that the department appears to be doing everything they can to drive endangered fish species to extinction. The tunnels will have an impact on river flows at a critical time for salmon and smelt. They will reduce flows needed for the survival of the winter run, spring run and smelt.”
To grant a “take permit” under the CESA, the agency has to show how the project won’t jeopardize the continued existence of endangered species. Miller said the “mitigation” in the permit wouldn’t address the main problem of reduction in water flows on the Sacramento River and Delta that would take place if the project is built.
“They can pretend they are making up for water diversions at a critical time for these fish by throwing money at ‘habitat restoration,” but you just can’t mitigate for the taking of the water from these fish that essential for them to thrive,” Miller said.
The Department also violated CESA by failing to use the “best available science” on the impacts of the tunnels and associated water diversion, noted Miller.
Miller emphasized, “It’s time to kill this misguided tunnels project once and for all and focus on improving fresh water flows to restore the Delta.”
The tunnels project, renamed the California WaterFix in 2015, would divert massive amounts of fresh water from the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta to San Joaquin Valley agribusiness interests and Southern California water agencies, doing enormous harm to imperiled Central Valley salmon runs, declining Delta fish populations and the Bay-Delta ecosystem.
“State officials from the governor on down falsely claim that WaterFix would improve conditions for critically endangered native fish, including California’s once abundant chinook salmon,” said Trent Orr, Earthjustice staff attorney. “But disrupting a vast area with decades of construction to take even more fresh water from an already degraded Delta would hasten these species’ demise, not restore them to healthy populations.”
The groups said the California WaterFix is only the latest in “a long line of water diversion projects intended to remove vast quantities of water from the Delta before it reaches San Francisco Bay.”
The project, a boondoggle that would cost anywhere from $17 billion to $67 billion depending on who you talk to, proposes to construct two 35-mile tunnels, each four stories high, to divert water from the Sacramento River in the north Delta to Central and Southern California.
“The water diversions would degrade habitat conditions for declining runs of salmon and smelt, kill young fish at diversion points, disrupt the estuary’s food chain and increase salinity in the Delta,” according to the groups.
Erica Maharg, managing attorney at San Francisco Baykeeper, pointed out how the tunnels project would devastate the San Francisco Bay ecosystem also.
“The Bay ecosystem needs freshwater inputs to survive and be healthy,” she said. “By allowing the proposed tunnels to export too much freshwater for central and Southern California, the Department of Fish and Wildlife is shirking its duty to protect the already threatened and endangered fish of San Francisco Bay.”
"Construction and operation of the tunnels will devastate California's native fisheries, threaten thousands of fishing jobs, and leave the Bay-Delta estuary worse off than today," summed up Doug Obegi, a senior attorney with the Natural Resources Defense Council.
The issuing of the CDFW incidental take permit is just one of many actions taken in Jerry Brown’s campaign to plunder California’s fish, wildlife, people and environment to serve the greed of Big Ag and Big Oil since he began his third term as Governor in January 2011.
Over just the past couple of months, the Brown administration has incurred the wrath of environmental justice advocates, conservationists and increasing numbers of Californians by:
- Ramrodding Big Oil’s environmentally unjust cap-and-trade bill, AB 398, through the legislature
- Approving the reopening of the dangerous SoCalGas natural gas storage facility at Porter Ranch
- Green-lighting the flawed EIS/EIR documents permitting the construction of the California WaterFix.
On February 6 of this year, twelve public interest groups, led by Consumer Watchdog and Food & Water Watch, unveiled a comprehensive "report card" on Jerry Brown Administration’s environmental record showing that he falls short in six out of seven key areas, including oil drilling, fossil fuel generated electricity, toxic emissions, the California Environmental Quality Act, coastal protection and water. Read the report “How Green Is Jerry Brown?” at: http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/isbrowngreen
CBD: Background on the California WaterFix
The proposed WaterFix diversion of Delta water would dramatically degrade habitat and water quality conditions for chinook salmon, longfin smelt and Delta smelt by decreasing flows into and through the Delta, placing already fragile and declining fish populations in serious jeopardy of extinction. All of these fish species are protected under the California Endangered Species Act.
The California Department of Fish and Wildlife cannot legally issue a permit to kill or “take” these protected species because operation of the tunnels would jeopardize the continued existence of the protected fish species.
Although the Act requires that any take of protected species must be minimized and fully mitigated, the Department failed to include mitigation measures that could successfully prevent these fish species from declining. The Department also violated the Act by failing to use the best available science on the impacts of the tunnels and associated water diversion.
Last week conservation groups challenged the legality of proposed bonds to pay for the construction of the tunnels project. Earlier this week Westlands Water District, the largest supplier of irrigation water to California farms, voted to not participate in the Delta tunnels project.
A court ruling against the bonds or rejection of the project by major water districts could be fatal to WaterFix because the project’s success hinges on funding commitments by the recipients of the project water. Public funds cannot legally be used to pay for the project. Conservation groups have also challenged the adequacy of the environmental review for WaterFix under California’s Environmental Quality Act.
In addition to driving endangered species toward extinction, the project would devastate Delta farmers, Sacramento Valley communities and what is left of California’s salmon fishing economy. In response, a large array of organizations, public agencies and municipalities have now filed multiple lawsuits challenging the project on a wide variety of legal grounds, including 21 conservation and fishing groups, 30 water agencies, and 12 counties and cities, as well as the Winnemem Wintu Tribe and Delta farmers.”
BEER & ICE CREAM
Another Wonderful Weekend
Following Saturday night drinking Boddington's Pub Ale, watching baseball, and grooving to a rock band at Foley's Irish House in San Francisco, I attended a Sunday afternoon Mass at St. Patrick's Cathedral, which turned out to be celebrated in Tagalog. Afterwards, I had a conversation with the priest, and discussed my wish to now have a future plan, particularly with the church. He appreciated the fact that although I am secure and healthy, it is understood that I would be better off with more to do than drink beer, eat ice cream, and go to the beach. I explained that I am NOT retired in the conventional American sense. Rather, I am presently fancy free, and not committed to anything. The priest did acknowledge the 23 years I spent with Catholic Worker, and the many activist campaigns of the past. The understanding is that I will continue coming to the cathedral for Mass, and we will see what opportunities I will have to participate actively, hopefully leading to the fullest possible future. Peaceout.
Craig Louis Stehr